Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Besford Court
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Besford. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Besford Court (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Stub created in error. Besford Court is not a village. It is a large, but non notable private house 2Km from the village of Besford. The village of Besford already has a page. Kudpung (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator had forgotten to add {{afd}} to the article. I have now done so. Greg Tyler (t • c) 11:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Besford, which already has more information on Besford Court than does this article. Thryduulf (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above. JJL (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Thryduulf. JohnCD (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above - but without prejudice to re-creation as a substantive article if substantial information can be provided. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I endorse Peterkingiron's comments. The building is Grade II listed as are many of the walls etc around the estate. Mjroots (talk) 08:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.