Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 96' Lost Tapes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The 96' Lost Tapes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The 96' Lost Tapes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM and isn't mentioned at all in Phunk Junkeez, thus not making it a good candidate for a redirect. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

• Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Logs: 2011-02 ✗ G11

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect to Phunk Junkeez. While the nominator's right that this album wasn't mentioned in the main body of the band's page (I've now added it), it was listed in the band template at the bottom of the page. The album clearly fails WP:NALBUM, and the band's page is in dire need of a clean-up. As an aside, the page is mis-titled: according the the album cover, the apostrophe should be before the numbers. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

On reflection, I'm changing my vote to DELETE, given the typo in the page's title. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.