Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Checkmarx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Checkmarx

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Checkmarx
• Articles for deletion/Checkmarx (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Checkmarx (3rd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Checkmarx (company)

Draft:Checkmarx (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 06:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Still unchanged in 2 reviews in the last week and the sources are still too focused as announcements but, not only this, but also the fact the company is still young (past 10 years) so there's simply no better substance beyond it; article has continued with a PR emphasis. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

I changed the page three times adding more citations from reliable sources including WSJ, CBS News and TechCrunch. All are original pieces by these sources that are focused on the article's subject. Also, CatcherStorm has given some criteria for approval and I have provided those sources. The fact that the company is young is not a sufficient criteria for deletion. It has shown to be notable in its field on multiple levels and over time. אגם רפאלי (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 06:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.